Needs more than a quick edit9 of 12 checks passed
A PM could use most of it with light edits, but the prohibited hypothetical price/trial questions and missing must-ask/cut guidance need correction before it is safe to run.
Output
Autochase customer call guide (30 minutes)
What we need to learn
- How often late payments happen, and what customers actually do when they do.
- Whether chasing creates meaningful time, cash-flow, or relationship costs—and how customers handle those today.
- When automatic reminders would help, and what control or safeguards customers would need.
- Whether the value could justify a $10/month add-on.
Who to talk to
Recruit 8 account owners or purchase decision-makers who send invoices through Paydeck and have had at least one late invoice in the last 90 days. Aim for: - 4 who used “Send reminder” and 4 with late invoices who rarely or never used it. - A mix of freelancers and small agencies, account sizes, and Pro/free plans.
Don’t recruit only the 300 most frequent button users: they’re likely to overrepresent people already motivated to chase. Ask about recent late invoices; don’t tell people the feature idea before the call.
30-minute call
0–2 min | Set the tone “Thanks for speaking with us. We’re learning how invoicing works for you; there are no right answers. I’m interested in what you’ve actually done, not what you think we want to hear. We’re exploring ideas, not selling a product.” Ask permission before recording; otherwise take notes.
2–8 min | Recent experience “Think of the most recent invoice that was paid late. Can you walk me through what happened, from sending it to getting paid?” Probe: When was it due and paid? When did you realize it was late? What did you do next? What happened?
8–15 min | Current workflow “What, if anything, did you do to follow up?” Probe: How did you decide when and how to contact them? What did you send, and through what channel? How often does this happen? What do you do when you don’t send a reminder? Have you tried tools or changed your process?
15–20 min | Impact and trade-offs “What effect did that late payment have on your work or business?” Probe: Time spent? Cash-flow impact? Client relationship? What was most frustrating—or not especially difficult? How do you prioritize which invoices to chase?
20–25 min | Explore the idea After hearing their story, say neutrally: “We’re exploring a paid add-on that sends escalating reminders automatically when an invoice becomes overdue. There isn’t a product yet.” “What’s your first reaction?” Probe: What would be useful or unhelpful? Which invoices, if any, would you trust it with? What would you need to control—timing, wording, recipients, stopping reminders? What situations would make you not use it?
25–28 min | Value and price “How do you currently spend time or money dealing with late invoices?” “If this cost $10 a month, how would you decide whether it was worth it?” Probe: What would it need to save or improve? Would you trial it at that price? Why or why not? Treat stated intent as a clue, not proof of demand.
28–30 min | Close “What have I not asked that matters about getting paid late?” Thank them. Don’t promise a launch or specific functionality.
Notes for first-time interviewers
- Mei leads; Tomas takes notes. Agree beforehand who will ask follow-ups. Don’t interrupt or tag-team.
- Let the customer finish. Use silence; ask “Can you tell me more?” or “What happened next?”
- Ask about a specific past event before opinions or hypotheticals. Avoid “Would this be useful?”, “How frustrating is it?”, feature wishlists, and leading follow-ups.
- Don’t defend the idea, pitch solutions, or share Paydeck’s late-payment statistics; these can bias answers.
- Capture examples, exact phrases, workarounds, and contradictions—not just “yes/no.” Separate what people did from what they say they might do.
Decision after 8 calls
These calls are directional, not a market-size estimate. Go ahead with a narrowly scoped MVP/pilot next quarter if at least 5 of 8 describe recurring late-payment problems with concrete business or time costs, and at least 4 of 8 see a credible reason to try automation at $10/month and can explain the controls they’d need. Check that interest isn’t confined to one narrow user type.
Stop or defer if 2 or fewer describe meaningful recurring burden, most already handle it easily, or trust/client concerns make automation unacceptable even with reasonable controls. If evidence is mixed or concentrated in one segment, don’t commit broadly: refine the target or concept and test again.
Claims the judge couldn’t find in the brief
- The output’s recruiting filter assumes there are at least 8 account owners or purchase decision-makers with a late invoice in the last 90 days.
- The heaviest reminder users are likely to overrepresent people already motivated to chase.
Grades and run details
Decision model 92 · LLM judge 9 of 13 checks
Decision model checks
- passUses the supplied evidence correctly68%
- passAddresses the actual decision93%
- partialRespects explicit constraints18%
- passIdentifies material uncertainty89%
- passAvoids unsupported claims76%
- passProduces the required deliverable93%
- passTalks to the right people100%
- passCoaches first-time interviewers100%
- passDesigned to falsify85%
- passAsks what people did, not what they think64%
- passDoesn't lead the witness61%
- partialMarks what to cut if the call runs over48%
Run
- Run
- #1
- API response time
- 31 s
- Submitted
- 30 Sept 2026