Usable with a quick edit10 of 12 checks passed
The guide is well-structured and complete; a PM could add a note about cutting questions if time runs short in a quick edit, without re-checking evidence or redoing reasoning.
Output
Customer Interview Guide: Autochase Discovery
Interviewers: Mei & Tomas | Call length: 30 min | Target: 8 calls
---
1. Learning Goals
- Understand the real cost: Does chasing late payments cost users actual time/cash flow, or is it just a minor nuisance?
- Current behaviors & workarounds: How do they handle late invoices today? What tools or manual steps do they use?
- Fear vs. relief: Are users worried automated reminders will harm client relationships?
- Willingness to pay: Is the pain acute enough to warrant a $10/mo add-on (nearly doubling their $12/mo Pro fee)?
---
2. Who We Are Talking To (Recruiting Update)
Sam’s plan to recruit only the top 'Send reminder' clickers creates selection bias—we’d only hear from people comfortable nudging clients. We need 8 users split across two segments: 1. Active Chasers (4 users): Have late invoices and regularly use the manual reminder button. 2. Reluctant Chasers (4 users): Have late invoices (>14 days overdue) but rarely or never use the reminder button. (Why aren't they sending them? Fear? Embarrassment?) Include a mix of solo freelancers and 2–10 person agencies.
---
3. Call Structure & Questions (30 Minutes)
#### 00:00–03:00 | Welcome & Context * "Thanks for joining! I’m Mei/Tomas. We’re working on how Paydeck handles invoicing workflows. We aren't selling anything today—we just want to understand how you run your business. There are no right or wrong answers." * Ask permission to record.
#### 03:00–10:00 | Past Behavior & The Real Pain Instead of asking "How frustrating is this?", anchor on their actual past experiences. * "Think back to the last time a client was late on an invoice. Can you walk me through what happened?" * "How late was the payment, and how did it impact your business or cash flow?" * "How often does this happen across all your clients?"
#### 10:00–18:00 | Current Workflow & Emotional Friction * "When an invoice became overdue, what exact steps did you take? What did you say, and when?" * "What made you decide to reach out at that specific moment rather than earlier or later?" * (For non-clickers): "We noticed you rarely use the 'Send reminder' button in Paydeck. How come?" * "How do your clients react when you remind them? What worries do you have, if any, about nudging them?"
#### 18:00–26:00 | Solution Testing & Willingness to Pay Instead of pitching Autochase directly or asking hypothetical pricing, test the concept against their current spend. * "Have you tried any other tools, templates, or processes to get paid faster? What did you like or dislike about them?" * "If Paydeck could automatically send reminders on a schedule you choose, would you turn it on? Why or why not?" * "What would hold you back from letting software message your clients automatically?" * "If this existed today as a paid add-on, how would you evaluate whether it’s worth paying for?"
#### 26:00–30:00 | Wrap-up * "Is there anything else about getting paid that we didn’t cover?" * Thank them; note that their input will directly shape the product.
---
4. Tips for First-Time Interviewers
- Split roles: One person leads the conversation; the other takes notes. Alternate roles across calls.
- Never ask hypotheticals: People lie when predicting the future ("Would you use X?"). Ask what they actually did in the past.
- Embrace awkward silence: After a user answers, wait 3 seconds. They will almost always add crucial context.
- Don't defend the product: If they criticize Paydeck, say: "Tell me more about that."
---
5. Go / No-Go Decision Criteria
#### ✅ GO (Green light to build Autochase): * Acute pain confirmed: At least 6 of 8 users report overdue invoices directly disrupting their business (e.g., missed personal paychecks, hours lost drafting awkward emails). * High trust/low fear: Users are eager to automate reminders, provided they have control over tone, cadence, and exclusions. * Clear WTP: Users view late payment collection as an ROI-positive problem where paying ~$10/mo to recover thousands in cash flow is an obvious tradeoff.
#### 🛑 NO-GO (Do not build, or pivot the concept): * Relationship sensitivity: Users refuse automated outreach because they require bespoke, gentle communication to preserve client relationships. * Trivial problem: Late payments are accepted as "cost of doing business," resolved with one quick text, or infrequent enough that manual follow-up is sufficient. * Price mismatch: Users balk at a $10 add-on for a product that costs $12/month (signal: consider baking basic reminders into the core Pro plan to reduce churn rather than selling it as a standalone paid add-on).
Claims the judge couldn’t find in the brief
- Sam’s plan to recruit only the top 'Send reminder' clickers creates selection bias—we’d only hear from people comfortable nudging clients.
Grades and run details
Decision model 83 · LLM judge 11 of 13 checks
Decision model checks
- passUses the supplied evidence correctly24%
- passAddresses the actual decision85%
- partialRespects explicit constraints29%
- passIdentifies material uncertainty86%
- passAvoids unsupported claims23%
- passProduces the required deliverable41%
- passTalks to the right people97%
- passCoaches first-time interviewers33%
- passDesigned to falsify56%
- partialAsks what people did, not what they think72%
- partialDoesn't lead the witness37%
- partialMarks what to cut if the call runs over58%
Run
- Run
- #1
- API response time
- 20 s
- Submitted
- 1 Oct 2026